Ark.
Court
Hears School Funding Arguments
By JAMES JEFFERSON
Associated Press Writer
The
Arkansas Supreme Court claimed control Thursday over the
future of the state's school system, saying the Legislature
had missed its deadline to come up with a plan to resolve a
decades-long fight over school quality.
The justices said they will appoint a special master to
recommend ways to bring education up to constitutional
standards. The Legislature can continue its attempts to
address the issue, but the court will decide whether they
are adequate.
However, the court did not order the state to fund schools
with money earmarked for other services and departments - a
move requested by the school district that started the case.
Arkansas
officials
had developed what Gov. Mike Huckabee called a "doomsday"
plan to keep essential services running in case justices
made such a ruling.
The court order came after a hearing Thursday at which a
lawyer for the state acknowledged that legislators missed a
Jan. 1 deadline for coming up with ways to improve schools.
The state pleaded for more time, but justices expressed
impatience.
"I don't want to run your schools, but I'm ready to do
something. I'm ready to act," Justice Donald Corbin told
assistant attorney general Tim Gauger.
The court did not say when it would appoint a special
master, or how long the master would have to analyze the
school system.
In November 2002, the high court said
Arkansas
didn't
spend enough money on education and distributed funds
unevenly. It ordered changes in the $1.8 billion system and
gave the state until
Jan. 1,
2004
, to put
them in place.
Legislators failed to reach an agreement last year, divided
largely by Huckabee's plan to merge the smallest 100 or so
districts to make schools more efficient.
Legislators have met in special session since Dec. 8, but
the new year arrived with no significant changes in the way
Arkansas
educates
about 450,000 students in 308 districts.
At the state Capitol on Thursday, the House refused to
approve a $10 million study on the state's deteriorating
school buildings. Capital improvements also are part of the
Supreme Court's 2002 mandate.
The court case stems from a lawsuit filed in 1992 by the
Lake
View
School
District
, but the
state's education system also was declared unconstitutional
in 1983.
Lake
View
lawyer
Bill Lewellen had called on the court to order up to $1
billion more in new school spending, at the expense of other
state departments. But the justices questioned whether that
would solve problems such as unequal distribution of school
resources.